Insane

How Lexington And Concord Was About Gun Control

sig sauer scope United States has a really interesting strategy to our history with gun control. On the one hand, Massachusetts residents proudly assemble in April to reenact the battles that occurred at the historic websites of Lexington and Concord. Patriot's Day is even put aside as a authorized holiday in honor of the battles. State leaders do not ever want the world to forget who fired the shot heard round the world. Yet, the identical state shudders at tying their very own history to the debate on gun possession, the Second Modification, and the present battles to guard these rights with their celebration of these historic occasions.


Nonetheless, there isn't any denying the purpose of these battles. The seven hundred British soldiers dispatched to Lexington and Concord were not there to collect tax revenues. British leaders ordered the elite British infantry to Concord to confiscate and destroy weapons and ammunition the colonists had been storing. British leaders hoped to quell further rebellion by setting an instance. They'd seize weapons and round up local leaders for trial in England.


British leaders acknowledged that gun control was a strong weapon for population control. Occupation troops sent to quell rebellion and restore order already intimated residents in Boston. Many feared there was little colonists could do towards one of the vital highly effective armies on the planet. Nevertheless, the British government noticed things otherwise. As long as residents remained armed, there was a potential risk of citizens uprising in opposition to the King's troops. Seizing guns and powder left locals unable to defend themselves and way more prone to relinquish much more of their rights as British citizens.


The residents of Massachusetts had broken no laws in possessing weapons. On many occasions, the British leaders in Massachusetts had demonstrated they'd no issue with trampling on the colonists' rights as English residents. Sending armed troops into the country to seize legally owned weapons was just one more assertion that the British government did not see any need to respect the colonists' rights when they felt there was a disaster that justified their actions.


When trendy Massachusetts residents participate in celebrating the battles of Lexington and Concord, it is very important do not forget that the British did not come to cease the residents from having an area militia. They brought no orders ordering the Minutemen to disband. They came for the guns and powder. With out weapons, the Minutemen weren't a lot of a threat to the British government. That's the reason the second modification is not about supporting a trendy National Guard loyal to the government. The Second Amendment harkens again to citizens who chose to stand and defend their rights as citizens.


The experiences of the Revolution made gun ownership so vital that the writers of the Constitution made it the Second Amendment within the Bill of Rights. They left no confusion in their writing about the worth they positioned on gun possession. The experiences with British gun control efforts at Lexington and Concord, had taught them the importance of creating gun ownership a Constitutional proper. It then turned the citizens' duty to make the brand new authorities respect it.



Back to posts
This post has no comments - be the first one!

UNDER MAINTENANCE